Prop. 13 was sold to California as a way to keep people in their homes,[Phil Ting] said in Santa Barbara last week.But today, what has happened is that its primary beneficiaries really aren't homeowners; they're commercial property owners and corporations.
Citing state revenue studies, Ting estimates that assessing commercial property at market rate, instead of older, Prop. 13-enabled values, would generate an additional $7.5 billion in tax revenue — a big chunk of recent budget shortfalls.Before Prop. 13, commercial property owners in San Francisco paid about 60 percent of the city's property taxes, and homeowners about 40 percent; three decades later, the ratio has been reversed, a trend also seen elsewhere.
For more, see Third-Rail Man by , October 14, 2010 at The Santa Barbara Independent.
No comments:
Post a Comment