Defenders of low taxes on the rich mainly make two arguments: that low taxes on capital gains are a time-honored principle, and that they are needed to promote economic growth and job creation. Both claims are false.When you hear about the low, low taxes of people like Mr. Romney, what you need to know is that it wasn't always thus — and the days when the superrich paid much higher taxes weren't that long ago. Back in 1986, Ronald Reagan — yes, Ronald Reagan — signed a tax reform equalizing top rates on earned income and capital gains at 28%. The rate rose further, to more than 29%, during Bill Clinton's first term.
Low capital gains taxes date only from 1997, when Mr. Clinton struck a deal with Republicans in Congress in which he cut taxes on the rich in return for creation of the Children's Health Insurance Program. And today's ultralow rates — the lowest since the days of Herbert Hoover — date only from 2003, when former President George W. Bush rammed both a tax cut on capital gains and a tax cut on dividends through Congress, something he achieved by exploiting the illusion of triumph in Iraq.
For more, see Taxes at the Top by , January 19, 2012 at NYTimes.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment